4.7 Article

Self-similarity in particle accumulation on the advancing meniscus

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
卷 925, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2021.647

关键词

lubrication theory; suspensions; thin films

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR 2003706, DMS 1846854]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of shear-induced migration, advancing fluid-fluid interface, and Taylor dispersion results in the self-similar and gradual accumulation of particles. The self-similarity in the concentration profile of the accumulating particles is a striking feature observed in experiments, with theoretical explanations based on the suspension balance model and particle transport equation. The solutions to the particle transport equation show self-similarity with slight deviations and are in excellent agreement with experimental observations.
When a mixture of viscous oil and non-colloidal particles displaces air between two parallel plates, the shear-induced migration of particles leads to the gradual accumulation of particles on the advancing oil-air interface. This particle accumulation results in the fingering of an otherwise stable fluid-fluid interface. While previous works have focused on the resultant instability, one unexplored yet striking feature of the experiments is the self-similarity in the concentration profile of the accumulating particles. In this paper, we rationalise this self-similar behaviour by deriving a depth-averaged particle transport equation based on the suspension balance model, following the theoretical framework of Ramachandran (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 734,2013, pp. 219-252). The solutions to the particle transport equation are shown to be self-similar with slight deviations, and in excellent agreement with experimental observations. Our results demonstrate that the combination of the shear-induced migration, the advancing fluid-fluid interface and Taylor dispersion yield the self-similar and gradual accumulation of particles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据