4.7 Article

Influence of swirl on the supersonic wake flow structure behind blunt-based axisymmetric afterbodies

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
卷 925, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2021.465

关键词

compressible flows; wakes; vortex breakdown

资金

  1. Institute of Fluid Mechanics at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wind tunnel experiments were conducted using cylindrical models with canted fins, showing different wake flow patterns at varying fin-cant angles. The results indicated that the rotation introduced by the fins led to distinct changes in the wake flow, with higher rotation resulting in more complex flow structures.
Wind-tunnel experiments have been conducted on cylindrical models with canted fins. The fins introduced a swirling motion into the wake downstream of a blunt-based afterbody aligned with a Mach 2 flow. Measurements of the velocity field downstream of the models and the pressure distribution at the model base show evidence of two wake flow patterns distinctively differing from the classical supersonic wake, depending on the degree of rotation introduced. For a fin-cant angle of 16 degrees, a rotating wake flow with a central, downstream-directed vortex tube and a concentric, counter-rotating, toric vortex pair forms. A higher fin-cant angle of 32 degrees, in turn, results in a swirling flow surrounding a region of low-momentum flow at the axis. Near the central axis of the flow field an upstream flow establishes, extending from the far wake up to the model base. Numerical simulations have been performed to explain the fluid-dynamic processes and the origins of the experimentally observed structural changes of the rotating wakes. The results of the large-scale-turbulence-resolving simulations agree qualitatively well with the measured flow fields. The numerical results show that the centrifugal forces decrease the base pressure and cause the experimentally observed structural changes in the wake.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据