4.7 Article

Electric-field-controlled diffusion of anisotropic particles: theory and experiment

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
卷 924, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2021.653

关键词

suspensions; general fluid mechanics

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-135156, AFOSR-FA9550-16-1-0181, CBET-1604931, CMMI-1762905]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the anisotropic diffusion of isolated prolate spheroidal particles in the presence of an aligning potential field, revealing the explicit formulas for diffusion coefficients and showing good agreement between theoretical predictions and experimental results. The research provides insights into the coupling between rotation and translation in diffusion processes, as well as ways to control the diffusion of particles with aligning potential fields.
We report on a theoretical and experimental study on the anisotropic diffusion of isolated prolate spheroidal particles in the presence of an aligning potential field. By analysing the microscopic stochastic equations of motion, we obtained the coarse-grained Fokker-Planck equations that govern the evolution of the probability distributions of particle orientation in various configurational spaces. In particular, we found explicit formulae for the diffusion coefficients parallel (D-x) and perpendicular (D-y) to the field direction in the long-time limit. The predicted results were experimentally validated by measuring the Brownian motions of fluid-suspended carbon nanotubes in an electric field. Good agreement was observed between theoretical and experimental results, both of which showed increasing D-x and decreasing D-y with increasing field strength up to a critical field strength beyond which both curves start to flatten. Our theory and experimental results provide a framework for understanding the coupling between rotation and translation in a diffusion process, and for controlling the diffusion of particles with aligning potential fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据