4.4 Review

Understanding behaviour to improve the welfare of an ornamental fish

期刊

JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY
卷 99, 期 3, 页码 726-739

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14802

关键词

angelfish; cognitive ability; environmental enrichment; feeding; reproduction; social interaction

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [428296/2016-5, 312410/2019-0, 154975/2016-8]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reviews the behavior, cognitive abilities, and impact of environmental enrichment on the welfare of angelfish. It suggests recommendations for improving rearing conditions and emphasizes the importance of behavioral research in enhancing the welfare of angelfish and potentially other fish species.
Some common practices in aquaculture, ornamental trade and fish facilities may disturb the behavioural repertoire of fish and its natural adaptive value, reducing welfare and impairing fish production. Hence, it is necessary to understand fish behaviour, as well as the factors affecting it, to improve the quality of fish's life under artificial environment. Here, we reviewed the behaviour of the angelfish Pterophyllum scalare, an Amazonian cichlid used worldwide both as an ornamental fish and as a fish model in scientific research. We characterized social, reproductive and feeding behaviour, as well as the amazing cognitive ability of the angelfish. In addition, we reviewed the effects of environmental enrichment and suggested some important variables that need to be considered for rearing P. scalare. In this review, we show for the first time a synthesis on behaviour and a best practice overview to improve the welfare of angelfish as a target species. Nonetheless, most topics reviewed fit a broader set of fish species, particularly ornamental ones. This synthesis can therefore open a path for further behavioural research applied to the welfare of angelfish and bring insights to other fish species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据