4.7 Article

Interactions between Lepidium perfoliatum seed gum - Grass pea (Lathyrus sativus) protein isolate in composite biodegradable film

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 302-314

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.10.020

关键词

Lidium perfoliatum seed gum; Lathyrus sativus protein isolate; Protein-polysaccharide interactions; Biodegradable film

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lepidium perfoliatum seed gum (LPSG) film is brittle and permeable to water vapor. Therefore, in the present study different proportions of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus) protein isolate (LSPI) and glycerol (GLY) were used to improve the quality of the film. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy techniques were used to highlight the interactions between the two biopolymers. With addition of LSPI, the intensity and wave number of peaks changed, due to the interactions occurred between LPSG and LSPI. LPSG-LSPI blends had single glass transition temperature (T-g), meaning that LPSG and LSPI has formed a one phase blend. The moisture content, moisture absorption, water solubility and water vapor barrier of composite films significantly decreased with addition of LSPI to LPSG. Increasing LSPI to LPSG ratio led to a decrease in tensile strength (TS), young's modulus (YM) and melting point (T-m). Addition of LSPI to the composite films increased their transparency, whereas, elongation at break (EB) significantly increased when the LPSG ratio enhanced. The lightness of the composite film decreased and the film became greenish and bluish in color when the LSPI proportion increased. With incorporation of LSPI, the microstructure of films changed to a continuous and uniform network without any pores or cracks. As a result, the mechanical properties of LPSG film improved with addition of LPSI to the formulation and film made from 80:20 LPSG to LSPI ratio and 60% GLY could be used as a new biodegradable film with acceptable physical properties. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据