4.7 Review

Regulatory mechanisms of immune checkpoints PD-L1 and CTLA-4 in cancer

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13046-021-01987-7

关键词

PD-L1; CTLA-4; Cancer immunotherapy; Regulatory mechanism; Drug intervention

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82073893, 81873635, 81472693, 81903663]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M633002]
  3. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2018SK2101, 2018JJ3838]
  4. Hunan Provincial Health Committee Foundation of China [C2019186]
  5. Xiangya Hospital Central South University postdoctoral foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The regulatory mechanisms of PD-L1 and CTLA-4 play a crucial role in immunotherapy, and understanding their interactions can help improve patients' treatment responses and clinical care.
The cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4)/B7 and programmed death 1 (PD-1)/ programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are two most representative immune checkpoint pathways, which negatively regulate T cell immune function during different phases of T-cell activation. Inhibitors targeting CTLA-4/B7 and PD1/PD-L1 pathways have revolutionized immunotherapies for numerous cancer types. Although the combined anti-CTLA-4/B7 and anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy has demonstrated promising clinical efficacy, only a small percentage of patients receiving anti-CTLA-4/B7 or anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy experienced prolonged survival. Regulation of the expression of PD-L1 and CTLA-4 significantly impacts the treatment effect. Understanding the in-depth mechanisms and interplays of PD-L1 and CTLA-4 could help identify patients with better immunotherapy responses and promote their clinical care. In this review, regulation of PD-L1 and CTLA-4 is discussed at the levels of DNA, RNA, and proteins, as well as indirect regulation of biomarkers, localization within the cell, and drugs. Specifically, some potential drugs have been developed to regulate PD-L1 and CTLA-4 expressions with high efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据