4.2 Article

Comparison of approaches to quantify SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater using RT-qPCR: Results and implications from a collaborative inter-laboratory study in Canada

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 218-229

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2021.01.029

关键词

COVID-19; Wastewater surveillance; Public health; Quality assurance; Quality control

资金

  1. CHEO (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario) CHAMO (Children's Hospital Academic Medical Organization) grant
  2. Next generation solutions to ensure healthy water resources for future generations - Global Water Futures program, Canada First Research Excellence Fund [419205]
  3. Canada Research Chairs Program of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. NSERC
  5. NSERC Alliance COVID-19 Grant
  6. Mitacs through the Mitacs Accelerate program
  7. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Alberta Innovates, Alberta Health-Water for Life Strategy
  8. BC center for Disease Control
  9. BC center for Disease Control Foundation for Public Health and Metro Vancouver
  10. Canada Research Chairs Program of NSERC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater can inform public health decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the analysis methods are not yet standardized globally. Research in Canada showed that different methods yielded comparable results with low variability, suggesting the need for a consistent method for evaluating wastewater SARS-CoV-2 temporal trends.
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater is a promising tool for informing public health decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, approaches for its analysis by use of reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) are still far from standardized globally. To characterize inter- and intra-laboratory variability among results when using various methods deployed across Canada, aliquots from a real wastewater sample were spiked with surrogates of SARS-CoV-2 (gamma-radiation inactivated SARS-CoV-2 and human coronavirus strain 229E [HCoV-229E]) at low and high levels then provided blind to eight laboratories. Concentration estimates reported by individual laboratories were consistently within a 1.0-log(10) range for aliquots of the same spiked condition. All laboratories distinguished between low- and high-spikes for both surrogates. As expected, greater variability was observed in the results amongst laboratories than within individual laboratories, but SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentration estimates for each spiked condition remained mostly within 1.0-log(10) ranges. The no-spike wastewater aliquots provided yielded non-detects or trace levels (<20 gene copies/mL) of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Detections appear linked to methods that included or focused on the solids fraction of the wastewater matrix and might represent in-situ SARS-CoV-2 to the wastewater sample. HCoV-229E RNA was not detected in the no-spike aliquots. Overall, all methods yielded comparable results at the conditions tested. Partitioning behavior of SARS-CoV-2 and spiked surrogates in wastewater should be considered to evaluate method effectiveness. A consistent method and laboratory to explore wastewater SARS-CoV-2 temporal trends for a given system, with appropriate quality control protocols and documented in adequate detail should succeed. (c) 2021 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据