4.2 Article

Optimization of zinc bioleaching from paint sludge using Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans based on response surface methodology

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2021.1979330

关键词

Bioleaching; hazardous waste; paint sludge; automotive industry; Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through a two-stage bioleaching process, the reduction of zinc metal in paint sludge was investigated using Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Four variables were optimized in the experiments, with the highest removal of 22.89% achieved under specific conditions. The rotation speed of the shaker was found to have the greatest effect on the bioleaching process, followed by the combination of shaker speed and pH.
The reduction of zinc metal in the paint sludge, a hazardous waste, was investigated using Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans by a two-stage bioleaching process. This process was performed using the response surface methodology (RSM) method based on the central composite design (CCD). Four variables, a temperature range of 32-34.5-37 degrees C, rotation speed of shaker 120-160-180 rpm, pH of 4.2-3.2-2.2, and particle sizes of 1-2-3 mm, were used to optimize the experiments. The results showed that with a constant pulp density of 10 g/L at 32 degrees C, shaker speed of 120 rpm, a particle size of 1 mm and pH of 4.2, the highest removal predicted by the software (Design Expert version 11) was 22.89%. Repeating the experiments confirmed a decrease in zinc to the nearest predicted point. According to the ANOVA result, the rotation speed of the shaker has the greatest effect on the bioleaching process, followed by the two variables of the rotation speed of shaker and pH together affects. After the bioleaching process, energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) and mapping analysis showed quantitative changes in the chemical composition of the paint sludge, and morphological changes of texture were confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据