4.7 Article

Calculating expected effects of treatment effectivity and river flow rates on the contribution of WWTP effluent to the ARG load of a receiving river

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 288, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112445

关键词

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR); Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs); Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs); ARG dissemination; Receiving water body

资金

  1. WWTPs
  2. COST Action [ES1403]
  3. NIVA's strategic research initiative on emerging environmental contaminants (Research Council of Norway) [208430]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The concentrations of genetic markers for antibiotic resistance genes in the effluents of three Norwegian wastewater treatment plants were measured, showing different contributions to the genetic marker load in rivers. Improved removal of genetic markers in WWTPs would greatly enhance river water quality. Consideration of flow rates and hydrologic characteristics of the recipient water body is crucial in deciding priorities for further removal of antibiotic resistance genes in WWTPs.
Concentrations of genetic markers for antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) were measured in the effluents of three Norwegian wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and in a receiving river upstream and downstream of the discharge point of one WWTP. Calculations based on mass balances were carried out to evaluate the impact of river flow rates and treatment effectivity on the WWTP?s contribution to the load of genetic markers in the river. At average river flow rates, the WWTP effluent contributes 5?15% to the genetic marker load of the respective river. However, at minimum river flow rates, the WWTP effluent contributes 22?55% to the loads of different genetic markers. Scenarios of an improved or worsened removal of genetic markers in the WWTP showed that a further 1-log removal using additional treatment would be sufficient to improve considerably the river water quality with respect to genetic markers. Then, at an average flow rate, the contribution of the WWTP effluent to the load of the river would be less than 2%. However, in the case of low treatment effectivity or malfunction of the WWTP, the marker load of the river would increase dramatically. Even at average flow rate, 75?92% of the marker load would then originate from the WWTP. The results demonstrate the importance of considering the flow rates and hydrologic characteristics of the recipient water body when deciding on priorities regarding the upgrade of WWTPs for further removal of ARGs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据