4.7 Article

Effect of dissolved soil organic matter on cesium adsorption by zeolite and illite

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 289, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112477

关键词

Humic acid; Fulvic acid; Andosol; Three-dimensional fluorescence analysis; Sorption isotherm

资金

  1. Takahashi Industrial and Economic Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the impact of DSOM on the Cs sorption by zeolite and illite in soil. Results showed that DSOM inhibited Cs sorption onto clay minerals, with a higher Cs sorption observed in the ionic solution compared to the soil solution.
In controlled landfill sites, soil layers are installed around radioactive waste to prevent the leaching of radioactive cesium (Cs). The Cs retention capacity of soil has been reported to be enhanced by mixing clay minerals. However, several studies have indicated that dissolved soil organic matter (DSOM) inhibits the Cs sorption by clay minerals. Therefore, this study assesses the effect of DSOM on the Cs sorption by zeolite and illite. Excitation emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy was used for DSOM in the soil solution before and after contact with clay minerals. The results show that DSOM sorption onto clay minerals, particularly fulvic acid, inhibited Cs sorption. Batch sorption tests were conducted to obtain the sorption isotherms using two sample solutions, namely, soil and ionic solutions. Soil solution, which contained DSOM, was prepared by mixing soil and ultrapure water and filtration using a 0.3-?m glass fiver filter. Ionic solution was prepared by removing DSOM larger than 500 Da from the soil solution using dialysis. The amount of sorbed Cs in the soil solution was lower than that in the ionic solution. Comparing the Freundlich coefficients (KF) between the soil and ionic solutions, we found that the KF values of zeolite and illite for the ionic solution accounted for 6.4- and 4.4-fold higher than that for the soil solution, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据