4.7 Article

Development and analysis of a new renewable energy-based industrial wastewater treatment system

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 290, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112564

关键词

Industrial wastewater; Solar energy; Waste water treatment; Energy; Exergy; Efficiency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduced a new solar energy-based integrated system to treat industrial brine wastewater, where system performance was comprehensively evaluated under varying operating parameters, with energy performance ranging from 12.5% to 15.9% annually. The membrane-based wastewater treatment subsystem showed an energy performance of 73.3%, while the evaporation-based subsystem had 15.4% energy performance.
In this research study, a new solar energy-based integrated system is developed for treating industrial brine wastewater. An integrated solar-powered evaporation and membrane-based water treatment technique is utilized. Both forced convection as well as falling film evaporators are incorporated to treat high-concentration rejected brine. The system performance is assessed through a comprehensive thermodynamic investigation at varying operating parameters. The energetic performance is evaluated to vary from 12.5% to 15.9% across the year. Furthermore, the peak efficiency in terms of exergy is found to be 11.1%. Also, the membrane-based wastewater treatment subsystem is found to entail an energetic performance of 73.3% and an exergetic performance of 34.6% in terms of efficiencies. Moreover, an energetic performance of 15.4% and an exergetic performance of 2.9% is found for the evaporation-based subsystem. The exergy destructions in each system component are evaluated and the power generation subsystem is determined to have the highest exergy destruction rate of 15.4 MW. To investigate the effects of varying design parameters and operating conditions on the system performance, several parametric studies are also performed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据