4.7 Article

Occurrence and factors associated with aflatoxin contamination of raw peanuts from Lusaka district's markets, Zambia

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 291-296

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.04.004

关键词

Aflatoxin; Peanut; Risk factors; Zambia

资金

  1. Southern African Centre of Infectious Disease Surveillance (SACIDS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peanuts, one of the most susceptible crops to aflatoxin (AF) contamination, are widely produced and consumed in Zambia. This cross-sectional study was designed to determine the levels of AFs in raw peanuts sold in Lusaka district's markets as well as identify factors associated with increased AF presence. Raw peanut samples were collected from open markets and supermarkets and analyzed for aflatoxin contamination using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). A questionnaire was also administered to the peanut vendors to investigate factors contributing to increased levels of AFs in peanuts. Of the 92 samples, 51 (55.4%; 95% CI: 44.9-65.4) tested positive for presence of AFs. The overall median and geometric mean +/- standard deviation (SD) concentration for AF were 0.23 ppb (range: 0.014 -48.67 ppb) and 0.43 +/- 9.77 ppb, respectively. The association between market types and presence of AFs was not statistically significant (Pearson X-2 = 0.0587, p = 0.809). Of 51 samples that tested positive to AF, 6.5% and 12% were above the maximum permissible limits (MPLs) set by the Codex Alimentarius Commission and European Union standards, respectively. There was a significant difference in the levels of AF between Chalimbana and Kadononga (p<0.0001), and also Chalimbana and Makulu red (p<0.0001). Chalimbana was the most at risk of AF contamination, when compared to other peanut varieties. The high level of AFs in raw peanuts from both supermarkets and open markets samples constitutes a health hazard for the population of Lusaka district. Therefore, intervention strategies that reduce the levels of AF contamination in peanuts should be given priority. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据