4.3 Article

Stable and bioactive W/O/W emulsion loaded with Pitanga (Eugenia uniflora L.) leaf hydroethanolic extract

期刊

JOURNAL OF DISPERSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 43, 期 12, 页码 1890-1900

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01932691.2021.1949339

关键词

Double emulsion; plant extract; physical stability; antioxidant activity; antimicrobial activity

资金

  1. Sao Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2013/07914-8, 2016/18788-1]
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [30.0799/2013-6]
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that the concentration of emulsifiers and phase ratios affect the droplet size and stability of the double emulsion. The double emulsion exhibited heterogeneous droplet size, good physical stability, and non-Newtonian behavior.
Pitanga leaf hydroethanolic extract (PLHE) presents high antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. The encapsulation of this extract in W/O/W double emulsions could protect its bioactive properties. The objective of this research was to encapsulate PLHE in the inner W phase of a double emulsion and analyze the emulsifiers concentrations and phase ratios effects on its droplet size and the physical stability. Moreover, the double emulsion rheological behavior, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities in their more stable formulation was investigated. For comparison purpose, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the PLHE was also determined. Overall, the droplet size and stability were affected by the concentration of emulsifiers and phase ratios. The double emulsion presented heterogeneous droplet size, good physical stability and non-Newtonian behavior. PLHE presented high antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, which was maintained after processing to encapsulation into double emulsion. In conclusion, it was possible to produce active and stable double emulsion loaded with PLHE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据