4.3 Article

Functional and structural properties of gum arabic complexes with casein and hydrolyzed casein achieved by Maillard reaction

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01932691.2021.1958686

关键词

Protein-polysaccharide reaction; Maillard; casein; gum Arabic; emulsifier

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, casein was extracted and hydrolyzed, and then conjugated with gum Arabic through the Millard reaction. Increasing the degree of hydrolyzation and the ratio of casein to gum Arabic accelerated the reaction and resulted in higher molecular weight. The conjugated biopolymers showed improved functional properties but lower foam stability.
In this study, casein was extracted from milk and hydrolyzed with pepsin at three different enzyme/substrate ratios (0.1:100, 0.15:100, and 0.2:100). Three molar ratios of casein or hydrolyzed caseing/gum Arabic (GA) (1:1, 1:2, and 2:1) were exposed to Millard reaction using wet heating method at 80 degrees C, 6 h. The conjugation of biopolymers through Millard reaction was verified by Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR), high performance size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) and fluorescence spectrophotometry methods. Higher molecular weight was observed after the reaction experiment. Moreover, FT-IR spectrum showed changes in amide 1 and 2 bands and fluorescence spectrophotometry showed reduction of intrinsic fluorescence intensity. Maillard reaction got faster by increasing the degree of hydrolyzation and GA/hydrolyzed casein ratio. Conjugates with higher ratios of GA/casein showed more stable particle size distribution against freeze-thawing process. Increasing the degree of hydrolyzation did not affect significantly on particle size distribution of conjugates. Functional properties of conjugated biopolymers including solubility, emulsifying and foaming properties were promoted compared to casein and casein/GA mixture. Also, hydrolyzed casein-GA showed better emulsifying and foaming ability but less foaming stability than non-hydrolyzed samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据