4.4 Review

Intestinal stricture in Crohn's disease: A 2020 update

期刊

JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 390-398

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13022

关键词

Crohn disease; intestinal fibrosis; pathogenesis; stricture

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81470821, 81630018, 8187030487, 81970483]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammatory disorder that can lead to fibrosis-associated intestinal strictures in 70% of patients, impacting their quality of life. Current therapies are limited in preventing or reversing fibrosis, leading to surgery for nearly half of patients.
Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic and relapsing-remitting inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. Approximately 70% of patients inevitably develop fibrosis-associated intestinal stricture after 10 years of CD diagnosis, which seriously affects their quality of life. Current therapies play limited role in preventing or reversing the process of fibrosis and no specific anti-fibrotic therapy is yet available. Nearly half of patients thus have no alternative but to receive surgery. The potential mechanisms of intestinal fibrosis remain poorly understood; extracellular matrix remodeling, aberrant immune response, intestinal microbiome imbalance and creeping fat might exert fundamental influences on the multiple physiological and pathophysiological processes. Recently, the emerging new diagnostic techniques have markedly promoted an accurate assessment of intestinal stricture by distinguishing fibrosis from inflammation, which is crucial for guiding treatment and predicting prognosis. In this review, we concisely summarized the key studies published in the year 2020 covering pathogenesis, diagnostic modalities, and therapeutic strategy of intestinal stricture. A comprehensive and timely review of the updated researches in intestinal stricture could provide insight to further elucidate its pathogenesis and identify novel drug targets with anti-fibrotic potentiality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据