4.2 Article

The Stress Concentration and Biomechanical Properties of the Intraoral Distractors and the Extraoral Distractors Used in Treatment of Hemifacial Microsomia Patients: A Simulation Finite Element Analysis Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 32, 期 8, 页码 2621-2625

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007805

关键词

Distraction osteogenesis; finite element analysis; hemifacial microsomia

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the stress distribution and bone displacement effects of intraoral and extraoral distractors in mandibular distraction through finite element analysis. The results showed that the intraoral system caused lower stress in the mandibular bone compared to the extraoral system, with higher stress concentration on the fixing screws. Overall, it is recommended to use intraoral distractors in general situations due to their stress shielding effect and lower displacement, while external devices are advised for longer distraction distances with lower stresses.
The Aim of the Study: Finite element analysis of the stresses subjected to both the intraoral and the extraoral distractors devices used in the mandibular distraction of hemifacial microsomia patients. Methodology: Two models were included in the current study. The first model was an extraoral distractor and the second model was an intraoral distractor model. To generate the results in the simulated models; 2 vertical loads were applied (222.7 and 137.78 N) on the defective and normal side, respectively. Results: The intraoral system observed lower stress (6.85 MPa) in the mandibular bone compared to the extraoral system (13.21 MPa). The intraoral distractor had a higher stress concentration on the distractor fixing screws (352 MPa) compared to the extraoral distractor fixing pins (15 MPa). The extraoral distractor had a higher displacement effect on the mandibular bone around the pins of 263.35 mu m in comparison to the intraoral distractor effect which was 77.87 mu m. Conclusions: Internal oral distractor provides a sort of stress shielding to the distracted bone and less displacement, so it is more advisable to be used in general. The external devices are advised only in extralong distraction distance because the distractor is subjected to lower stresses compared to intraoral counterparts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据