4.7 Article

Towards more sustainable surimi? PCR-cloning approach for DNA barcoding reveals the use of species of low trophic level and aquaculture in Asian surimi

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 62-69

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.09.027

关键词

Asian surimi; Cloning; DNA mini-barcoding; Egyptian markets; Spanish markets; Sustainability

资金

  1. EU MEDASTAR program
  2. Principado de Asturias (Spain) [GRUPIN14-093]
  3. Cluster of International Excellence of the University of Oviedo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, authentication of commercialized seafood products has become a market priority. In this study, 29 Asian surimi products produced in China, India and Singapore, and commercialized in two Mediterranean countries (Egypt and Spain), were analyzed in order to authenticate species contained in surimi products. Due to the processing treatments, classical identification methods are not effective. Therefore, we conducted two molecular tracing methodologies for species identification: direct sequencing of 16S rDNA PCR products, and DNA mini-barcoding-based PCR cloning for Cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI), with subsequent plasmid sequencing. In total, 10 fish species corresponding to 7 families were found. The Singaporean and Chinese surimi contained principally species of low trophic levels, like fringe scale sardines Sardinella fimbriata, and other, likely farmed, species such as striped catfish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus. The presence of low trophic level and aquaculture species suggests that current trends in surimi production are moving towards sustainability. The exception was a vulnerable shovelnose ray (Rhinobatos jimbaranensis) found in one product, which encourages further studies to detect the use of endangered species in such morphologically indistinct food items. We suggest PCR-cloning methodology for efficient species authentication in seafood controls, especially for mixed products. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据