4.6 Article

NANOGrav signal as mergers of Stupendously Large Primordial Black Holes

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/06/022

关键词

gravitational waves / theory; primordial black holes; non-gaussianity

资金

  1. ICCUB (Unidad de Excelencia Maria de Maeztu) [FPA2016-76005-C2-2-P, MDM-2014-0369]
  2. AGAUR [2017SGR-754]
  3. APIF grant from Universitat de Barcelona
  4. INPhINIT grant from laCaixa Foundation [100010434, LCF/BQ/IN17/11620034]
  5. European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [713673]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study suggests that the signal detected by NANOGrav could be from the stochastic gravitational wave background of binary mergers of primordial Stupendously Large Black Holes, which contribute roughly 0.1% of the dark matter. Overcoming the stringent limits from mu distortions of the CMB is possible if the perturbations in these black holes derive from the expected non-Gaussian distribution of fluctuations. However, the stochastic background from binaries with masses less than or equal to 10^11M-solar masses is excluded by constraints from large scale structure.
We give an explanation for the signal detected by NANOGrav as the stochastic gravitational wave background from binary mergers of primordial Stupendously Large Black Holes(SLABs) of mass M similar to (10(11) - 10(12)) M-circle dot, and corresponding to roughly 0.1% of the dark matter. We show that the stringent bounds coming from mu distortions of the CMB can be surpassed if the perturbations resulting in these BHs arise from the non-Gaussian distribution of fluctuations expected in single field models of inflation generating a spike in the power spectrum. While the tail of the stochastic background coming from binaries with M less than or similar to 10(11)M(circle dot) could both fit NANOGrav and respect mu distortions limits, they become excluded from large scale structure constraints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据