4.1 Article

Building Research Capacity in HIV and Noncommunicable Diseases in Africa: A Mentorship and Leadership Workshop Report

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000380

关键词

mentoring; HIV; noncommunicable diseases; workshop; leadership

资金

  1. Fogarty International Center
  2. National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism of the National Institutes of Health [1D43 TW011544]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a lack of structured mentoring programs targeting early-stage investigators in Africa, especially in areas with a high HIV burden. This study describes the findings from a workshop in Nigeria that aimed to build mentoring and leadership capacity in HIV and noncommunicable disease research for early-career physician scientists. The results showed that the participants identified building mentees' confidence and setting research goals as areas where they needed training the most. The workshop was rated favorably in multiple areas, and most participants stated that they learned something new and useful from each session.
Introduction: Few structured mentoring programs target early-stage investigators in Africa, creating a gap in mentorship skills where HIV burden is greatest. We describe findings from a Nigeria-based workshop for early-career physician scientists to build mentoring and leadership capacity in HIV and noncommunicable disease research. Methods: Baseline surveys captured participant demographics, confidence in implementing mentoring competencies, and perceived importance of workshop training domains. The workshop included didactic presentations, small group activities, and interactive discussions. Daily surveys evaluated sessions, and postworkshop surveys solicited overall course impressions. Results: Of the 33 participants, most were male (n = 21, 63.6%) and from medicine, laboratory sciences, and surgical specialties. Building mentees' confidence and setting mentees' research goals were ranked as areas where participants most believed they needed training. Sessions were rated favorably across five areas. Greatest improvements in mean scores were for confidence in identifying personal temperament styles, describing mentoring and leadership theories/frameworks, and developing mentoring plans. Additional identified workshop strengths were content relevance, leadership case series, interactive nature, and collegial atmosphere. All respondents indicated learning something new/useful/helpful in each session. At 6-month postworkshop, most respondents (25 of 26, 96%) had replicated or plan to replicate parts of the workshop in their departments/institutions. Discussion: Effective mentoring training initiatives targeting future academic leaders have the potential to create skilled academicians who can impart mentoring skills and competencies to their mentees.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据