4.5 Article

Ductile fracture simulation of cold-formed high strength steel using GTN damage model

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106832

关键词

High strength steel; Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) damage model; Stress triaxiality; Two-scale homogenisation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on the ductile failure of cold-formed S700 material using the GTN damage model. RVE models with varying void volume fractions investigate the pressure dependency of deviatoric limit stress. Through calibration of parameters, an equation for determining q(1) for different void volume fractions is proposed.
The use of high strength steel (HSS) cold-formed hollow section is of significant interest in the construction sector due to competitive costs. The accurate simulation of ductile fracture failure at the micro and macro scale is critical for improving the validity of predicting structural behaviour of HSS cold-formed hollow sections and welded joints. In this study, the ductile failure of the cold-formed S700 material is studied using the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) damage model. Representative volume element (RVE) models with the void volume fraction (VVF) between 0.1% and 30% are employed to investigate the pressure dependency of the deviatoric limit stress. Different load conditions corresponding to different stress triaxiality levels are applied to unit cells with random spherical pores. The inelastic response of the unit cells are analysed, and the parameters q(1), q(2), and q(3) in the GTN yield surface are calibrated. An equation is proposed to determine parameter q(1) for different VVFs. The parameters critical VVF f(c) and final VVF f(f) are calibrated by the coupon test from the literature. Finally, the calibrated GTN model is validated against notched coupon tests. The finite element (FE) results show good agreement with the experimental results, indicating that the identified GTN model could efficiently predict the behaviour of the cold-formed HSS. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据