4.7 Article

Olive oil sensory defects classification with data fusion of instrumental techniques and multivariate analysis (PLS-DA)

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 314-322

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.038

关键词

Virgin olive oil; Headspace-mass spectrometry (HS-MS); Mid infrared spectroscopy (MIR); UV-vis spectrophotometry; Data fusion; Multivariate analysis; Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA); Classification Sensory analysis

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology [AGL2011-26456]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three instrumental techniques, headspace-mass spectrometry (HS-MS), mid-infrared spectroscopy (MIR) and UV-visible spectrophotometry (UV-vis), have been combined to classify virgin olive oil samples based on the presence or absence of sensory defects. The reference sensory values were provided by an official taste panel. Different data fusion strategies were studied to improve the discrimination capability compared to using each instrumental technique individually. A general model was applied to discriminate high-quality non-defective olive oils (extra-virgin) and the lowest-quality olive oils considered non-edible (lampante). A specific identification of key off-flavours, such as musty, winey, fusty and rancid, was also studied. The data fusion of the three techniques improved the classification results in most of the cases. Low-level data fusion was the best strategy to discriminate musty, winey and fusty defects, using HS-MS, MIR and UV-vis, and the rancid defect using only HS-MS and MIR. The mid-level data fusion approach using partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) scores was found to be the best strategy for defective vs non-defective and edible vs non-edible oil discrimination. However, the data fusion did not sufficiently improve the results obtained by a single technique (HS-MS) to classify non-defective classes. These results indicate that instrumental data fusion can be useful for the identification of sensory defects in virgin olive oils. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据