4.4 Article

Experimental research on hybrid anchorages of prestressed composite strips for structural strengthening

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS
卷 55, 期 24, 页码 3539-3550

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/00219983211020349

关键词

Anchorages; CFRP strips; prestressing; strengthening

资金

  1. European Union under the Innovative Economy Operational Programme [POIG.01.03.01-18-010/12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper discusses the development of hybrid bonded/bolted anchorages of CFRP strips for a novel prestressing system, with thin steel plates clamped using high-strength friction grip (HSFG) bolts and epoxy adhesive to fix the CFRP strips. Tests on full-scale axial tensile specimens showed that the anchorages have an ultimate tensile strength of about 200 kN, sufficient for strengthening purposes, and have been successfully implemented on-site.
The prestressed unidirectional carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) strips are currently often used for flexural strengthening of concrete structures. To ensure reliable strengthening, strips have to be anchored at their ends to the surface. However, anchoring of unidirectional CFRP strips is difficult because of their weak transversal mechanical properties. Although several CFRP strip anchorage approaches have been developed to date, only very few were applied on-site. The paper presents the development of hybrid bonded/bolted anchorages of CFRP strips used in a novel prestressing system. The anchorages are made of thin steel plates, clamped with the high-strength friction grip (HSFG) bolts and epoxy adhesive, to fix the CFRP strips. The paper describes the results of full-scale tests carried out on a series of axial tensile specimens. The developed anchorage has an ultimate tensile strength of about 200 kN, i.e. 70% of the ultra-high CFRP strips' strength, which is sufficient for strengthening purposes. After a series of tests in the laboratory, the anchorages have been implemented on-site and an example is presented in the paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据