4.7 Article

Application of ionic liquids for elution of bioactive flavonoid glycosides from lime fruit by miniaturized matrix solid-phase dispersion

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 204, 期 -, 页码 167-175

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.012

关键词

Flavonoid glycosides; Lime fruit; Ionic liquids; Miniaturized matrix solid-phase dispersion; Ultra-performance liquid chromatography

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81274065]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY15H280016]
  3. Hangzhou social development of scientific research projects [20150533B05]
  4. Research on Public Welfare Technology Application Projects of Zhejiang Province [2014C37069]
  5. Young and Middle-Aged Academic Leaders of Hangzhou [2013-45]
  6. new-shoot Talents Program of Zhejiang province [2015R423070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, two flavonoid glycosides (neohesperidin and naringin) in lime fruit were effectively extracted by miniaturized matrix solid phase dispersion (MSPD), followed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection. The best results were obtained using Florisil (150 mg) as the sorbent and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (0.4 mL, 250 mM) as the elution solvent. This work represents the first attempt of using ionic liquids as a green eluent for extraction of the investigated compounds in miniaturized MSPD. Compared with the conventional methods, the proposed method is advantageous due to improved enrichment factor and reduced reagent consumption. A good linearity was observed with r(2) values (>0.998). Meanwhile, the method gave acceptable recoveries (90.16-96.47%) for the determination of flavonoids in plant samples. The limits of detection of the two analytes ranged between 4.08 and 5.04 mu g/g. The results showed that the optimized method has a great potential for sample preparation in routine analysis of complex plant samples. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据