4.7 Article

Polyphenolic profiles and antioxidant and antiradical activity of Italian berries from Vaccinium myrtillus L. and Vaccinium uliginosum L. subsp gaultherioides (Bigelow) SB Young

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 204, 期 -, 页码 176-184

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.106

关键词

Vaccinium myrtillus; Vaccinium uliginosum subsp gaultherioides; Anthocyanins; Flavonols; Flavanols; Phenolic acids; DPPH radical scavenging activity; FRAP antioxidant activity

资金

  1. Regione Toscana
  2. Il Baggiolo S.r.l.
  3. Danti Giampiero C. S.n.c.
  4. Azienda Agricola Il Sottobosco
  5. Farmaceutica MEV S.r.l. within the PRAF Misura 1.2. e grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Total soluble polyphenols (TSP), total monomeric anthocyanins (TMA), radical scavenging activity (RSA), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), and a number of anthocyanins, phenolic acids, coumarins, flavanols, dihydrochalcones and flavonols were investigated in Tuscan bilberry (i.e. Vaccinium myrtillus) and false bilberry (i.e. Vaccinium uliginosum subsp. gaultherioides Bigelow). V. myrtillus berries showed much higher TSP, TMA, RSA and FRAP values than V. uliginosum subsp. gaultherioides fruits. Moreover, very different profiles of individual phenolics were observed in the two species, being V. myrtillus mainly characterised by delphinidin and cyanidin glycosides, together with chlorogenic acid, and V. uliginosum subsp. gaultherioides dominated by malvidin derivatives and flavonols. Strong differences between the two species regarded also metabolites investigated herein for the first time, such as scopoletin, which was approximately two magnitude orders higher in V. uliginosum subsp. gaultherioides than in V. myrtillus berries. Very different abundances were also highlighted for cryptochlorogenic acid and quercetin-3-rhamnoside that were about ten-fold higher in bilberry than in false bilberry. When the anthocyanin composition pattern of Tuscan false bilberry was compared to those elsewhere reported for V. uliginosum fruits harvested in different world areas, some important differences were observed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据