期刊
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
卷 31, 期 9-10, 页码 1309-1326出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15988
关键词
bioethics; clinical ethics; empirical bioethics; moral distress; nursing; qualitative research
类别
资金
- Welcome Trust [108640/Z/15/Z]
- Wellcome Trust [108640/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
This study aims to explore moral distress in nursing practice empirically and conceptually, identifying factors that exacerbate and mitigate it, and constructing a model to represent its constituent parts. Using feminist empirical bioethics and interpretive phenomenology, data from critical care nurses in the UK was collected and analysed, leading to the development of the Moral Distress Model. The model highlights five compounding factors that influence nurses' moral distress experiences, providing insights for interventions to address moral distress.
Aims and Objectives To explore moral distress empirically and conceptually, to understand the factors that mitigate and exacerbate moral distress and construct a model that represents how moral distress relates to its constituent parts and related concepts. Background There is ongoing debate about how to understand and respond to moral distress in nursing practice. Design The overarching design was feminist empirical bioethics in which feminist interpretive phenomenology provided the tools for data collection and analysis, reported following the COREQ guidelines. Using reflexive balancing, the empirical data were combined with feminist theory to produce normative recommendations about how to respond to moral distress. The Moral Distress Model presented in this paper is a culmination of the empirical data and theory. Methods Using feminist interpretive phenomenology, critical care nurses in the United Kingdom (n = 21) were interviewed and data analysed. Reflexive Balancing was used to integrate the data with feminist theory to provide normative recommendations about how to understand moral distress. Results There are five compounding factors that exacerbate/ mitigate nurses' experiences of moral distress: epistemic injustice; the roster lottery; conflict between one's professional and personal responsibilities; ability to advocate and team dynamics. In addition to the causal connection and responses to moral distress, these factors make up the moral distress model which can guide approaches to mitigate moral distress. Conclusions The Moral Distress Model is the culmination of these data and theorising formulated into a construct to explain how each element interacts. We propose that this model can be used to inform the design of interventions to address moral distress.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据