4.5 Article

Serum Circ-FAF1/Circ-ELP3: A novel potential biomarker for breast cancer diagnosis

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24008

关键词

breast cancer; cancer biomarker; Circ-ELP3; Circ-FAF1; diagnostic efficiency

资金

  1. Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences [IR.MUK.REC.1398.170]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the diagnostic efficiency of combined circRNAs panel including Circ-ELP3 and Circ-FAF1 as a non-invasive marker for detecting breast carcinomas was shown to be high. The combined use of these circRNAs resulted in better diagnostic accuracy compared to using them separately.
Background Recently, measurement of serum circular RNAs (circRNAs) as a non-invasive tumor marker has been considered more. We designed the present study to investigate the diagnostic efficiency of serum Circ-ELP3 and Circ-FAF1, separately and simultaneously, for diagnosis of patients with breast cancer. Methods Seventy-eight female patients diagnosed as primary breast cancer participated in this study. We measured the level of circRNAs in serum specimens of the studied subjects. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted and the diagnostic efficiency for both circRNAs was determined. Results Compared to non-cancerous controls, Circ-ELP3 was upregulated in breast cancer patients (p-value = 0.004). On the other hand, serum Circ-FAF1 was seen to be decreased in breast cancer patients than controls (p-value = 0.001). According to ROC curve results, the area under the curve (AUC) for Circ-ELP3 and Circ-FAF1 was 0.733 and 0.787, respectively. Furthermore, the calculated sensitivity and specificity for Circ-ELP3 and Circ-FAF1 were 65, 64% and 77, 74%, respectively. Merging both circRNAs increased the diagnostic efficiency, with a better AUC, sensitivity and specificity values of 0.891, 96 and 62%, respectively. Conclusion Briefly, our results revealed the high diagnostic value for combined circRNAs panel, including Circ-ELP3 and Circ-FAF1 as a non-invasive marker, in detection of breast carcinomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据