4.7 Article

Water-energy-carbon nexus: A life cycle assessment of post-combustion carbon capture technology from power plant level

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 312, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127727

关键词

Post-combustion; Carbon capture; Water-energy-carbon; Nexus; Life cycle assessment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52006114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that the extensive deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology increases life cycle primary energy demand and water resources depletion, with membrane-based systems performing the best. However, as the capture rate increases, the greenhouse gas reduction rate decreases.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is widely regarded as an important strategy to limit CO2 emissions from point sources, especially for coal-fired power plants. However, current CO2 capture technologies are energyintensive and require substantial cooling capacities. The extensive deployment of CCS technology increases the energy and water stress in power sectors. This study considers a plant level nexus approach to assess the relationship between water, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions of four types of available post-combustion carbon capture power plants from life cycle perspective. It is found that the integration of CCS translates into an increase in life cycle primary energy demand (PED) by 21-46% and water resources depletion by 59-95% compared with the reference power plant with wet cooling tower system, where the membrane-based system exhibits the best performance. However, the life cycle GHG reduction rate reduced to 65%-70% at 90% capture rate. The life cycle energy and water cost of GHG mitigation were quantified as 3.06-7.32 kJ/kg CO2-eq and 1.72-3.00 kg/CO2-eq, respectively, demonstrating the presence of sharp trade-offs between GHG reductions and energy demand as well as water consumptions for carbon capture technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据