4.7 Article

How food choices link sociodemographic and lifestyle factors with sustainability impacts

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 300, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126896

关键词

Food consumption; Sustainability; Global warming potential; Land occupation; Social risks; Diet quality

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (National Research Programme 69: Sustainable and healthy diets: Trade-offs and synergies) [4069-166765]
  2. Swiss Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (FSVO) [5.17.02ERN]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the relationship between sociodemographic and lifestyle factors and different sustainability impacts of diets in Switzerland. Results showed that actions on food groups for health, social, or environmental reasons may affect societal groups differently, with reductions of some food groups, especially different types of meat, offering large potentials for synergies on multiple impact categories.
While the production of food causes major environmental impacts and poses social risks, consumption of healthy and nutritious food is essential for human wellbeing. Against this background, action to make current diets more sustainable is needed, which in turn requires knowledge on possibilities for improvement. In this study, we investigated how sociodemographic and lifestyle factors relate to different sustainability impacts of diets in Switzerland using recent dietary recall data (n = 2057). Of each dietary recall, we assessed six impacts: global warming potential, cropland and grassland occupation, social risks, diet quality, and diet cost. We investigated the association between sociodemographic and lifestyle factors and food choices as well as between sociodemographic and lifestyle factors and environmental and socio-economic impacts, and combined these results in a qualitative approach. The median impacts of Swiss dietary recalls were 3.25 kg CO(2)eq for global warming potential, 4.92 m(2) for cropland occupation, and 1.43 m(2) for grassland occupation. Further, the median score for social risks was 1.64 e+08 points (Social Hotspots Index), for diet quality 43.65 points (Alternate Healthy Eating Index), and 9.27 CHF for diet cost. Moreover, our results showed that any action on food groups, be it for health, social, or environmental reasons, potentially affects societal groups differently. Nationalities, language regions, age groups, and smoking status seemed particularly distinctive, while income or educational groups seemed hardly relevant. Further, reductions of some food groups, especially different types of meat, offer large potentials for synergies on multiple impact categories. Others, such as fruits and vegetables as well as fish and seafood, result in trade-offs. On the one hand, these food groups contribute to an improved diet quality. On the other hand, these food groups are costly, and the production of fruits and vegetables additionally poses social risks. Our results contribute to target measures to support environmentally-friendly, healthy, and social diets more effectively. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据