4.7 Article

Noble-metal-free metallic MoC combined with CdS for enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen evolution

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 322, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129018

关键词

MoC; CdS; Visible light; Cocatalyst; Photocatalytic hydrogen production

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22075046, 51972063, 21501127, 51502185]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2020J06038, 2019J01256]
  3. 111 Project [D17005]
  4. China postdoctoral science foundation [2019TQ0061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effective CdS/MoC photocatalyst enhances hydrogen production under visible light and shows promising potential as an alternative to Pt for photocatalytic hydrogen production from water.
Exploration of efficient and stable transition metal-based co-catalyst is of great importance for large-scale hydrogen production in the mean of photocatalytic water splitting. Herein, we propose an effective CdS/MoC photocatalyst for enhanced photocatalytic H-2 evolution under visible light irradiation (>= 420 nm). Upon coupling to CdS through a facile solution-mixing method, MoC was functionalized as an effective co-catalyst that accepts interface electron from CdS while promoting charges separation. Furthermore, DFT also confirmed a facilitated H* adsorption on CdS/MoC through its lowered Gibbs free energy (Delta G(H)*) of 0.37 eV, which is beneficial for H-2 production too. As a result, the optimum photocatalyst, with 5 wt% MoC coupled to CdS, induces the best hydrogen production rate of 224.5 mu mol h(-1), which is 7.5 times higher than that of pristine CdS. Meanwhile, an apparent quantum efficiency (AQE) of 7.6% was also recorded at 420 nm. In terms of H-2 generation, the synthesized CdS/MoC (5 wt%) is more superior to CdS/Pt (5 wt%) in an extent of 44.5%. This work confirms the competency of MoC as an effective cocatalyst and promising alternative to benchmarked Pt for photocatalytic hydrogen production from water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据