4.7 Article

Toward a viable ecological method for regenerating a commercial SCR catalyst - Selectively leaching surface deposits and reconstructing a pore landscape

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 316, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128291

关键词

Selective catalytic reduction; Nitrogen oxides removal; Catalyst regeneration; Thermoporometry; Catalyst pore landscape

资金

  1. National Science Center grant OPUS [2018/29/B/ST8/02303]
  2. National Centre for Research and Development [TANGO1/266384/NCBR/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Controlling carbon and nitrogen chemistry is crucial for human life. The removal of ecotoxic NOx from flue gases is important for electric power stations. Surface deposits can deactivate SCR systems, but innovative regeneration procedures have been developed to restore catalyst activity.
Controlling carbon and nitrogen chemistry is essential for human life and civilization. In particular, hightemperature combustion of carbon fuels in the air results in the formation of ecotoxic carbon and nitrogen oxides (NOx). Specifically, NOx needs to be removed from the flue gases of electric power stations. The selective catalyst reduction (SCR) systems support the deNOx (NOx removal) process; however, surface deposits deactivate the SCR system while operating. Moreover, the surface texture is damaged during the exploitation. We show here how this damage reveals itself in the pore landscape of the commercial SCR catalysts. In particular, for the first time, we showed how this could be assessed by a combination of thermoporometry (TPM) and gas physisorption. Accordingly, a correlation between the assessed quality of the pore landscape and the catalyst activity was determined and discussed. We designed a broad collection of new innovative regeneration procedures, which appear to be robust and selective methods for removing surface poisons. The optimal regeneration scheme fully restored the catalyst activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据