4.7 Article

Investigating the nexus between education expenditure, female employers, renewable energy consumption and CO2 emission: Evidence from China

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 312, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127824

关键词

CO2 emissions; Education expenditure; Female employers; Renewable energy consumption; ARDL model; And FMOLS

资金

  1. National Social Science Foundation Key Project: Measurement and Evaluation of CivilMilitary Integration Innovation Resources Allocation Efficiency in the New Era [20ZDA092]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study indicates that increasing education expenditure, the number of female employers, and the proportion of renewable energy consumption can help reduce CO2 emissions in both the long term and short term in China.
The present study empirically investigates the nexus between education expenditure, female employer, consumption of renewable energy, and CO2 emission in China. A total of 25 years of data spanning from 1991 to 2015 is used in the study. The World Bank data has been used as the source of data. Several econometric techniques, such as ADF, P.P, Bound test, ARDL, and fully FMOLS, have been applied to draw empirical inferences. The bound test reveals a long-run relationship between the considered variables. The estimations of the ARDL model show that education expenditure, female employers, and renewable energy consumption have a negative connection with CO2 emission. The study's findings indicate that increasing education expenditure, an increasing number of female employers, and increasing renewable energy consumption as a percentage of total energy use will help reduce CO2 emission in both the long term and short term in China. The fully modified ordinary least square (FMOLS) has been applied to test the robust impact of independent variables towards the dependent variable used in the study. And lastly, this study provides important policy recommendations that help in reducing CO2 emissions in the environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据