4.5 Article

Bioanalysis of selinexor in mouse plasma micro-samples utilizing UPLC-MS/MS

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2021.122781

关键词

Selinexor; Pharmacokinetics; Bioanalysis; UPLC; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [404521405, SFB 1389]
  2. Physician Scientist program of the Faculty of Medicine of Heidelberg University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An UPLC-MS/MS assay was established for the investigation of selinexor in mice, with high sensitivity and scalable sample processing capabilities. The assay showed high accuracy and was suitable for studying selinexor in small animal experiments.
Selinexor, a first-in-class inhibitor of the nuclear export protein Exportin-1 (XPO1), was recently approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma in combination with dexamethasone, and as monotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. To enable investigations of selinexor in mice, we established and validated an ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) assay in the plasma concentration range of 1-1000 ng/mL using plasma microsamples of 5 mu L. Protein depletion with acetonitrile was used for efficient isolation of selinexor which was followed by a dilution step, resulting in a scalable sample processing. Quantification was performed with positive electmspray ionization tandem mass spectrometry in the selected reaction monitoring mode. Due to the high sensitivity of the quantification and the scalable sample processing procedure, the assay can be used for different concentration ranges to either further decrease the achievable lower limit of quantification or to reduce the amount of plasma used. The assay showed interday and intraday accuracy of 89.0-109.0% with a corresponding precision <= 14.1%. Suitability for investigations of selinexor in small animal experiments was demonstrated by determination of plasma selinexor in mice after oral administration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据