4.5 Article

Development of a new nano arginase HPLC capillary column for the fast screening of arginase inhibitors and evaluation of their binding affinity

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2021.122751

关键词

Nano HPLC; Monolith; Arginase; Inhibitor; Screening; Dissociation constant; Binding affinity; IC50; Frontal analysis; Competitive analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple and rapid Nano LC method has been developed for screening arginase inhibitors, using immobilized biotinylated arginase on a neutravidin functionalized nano HPLC capillary column. The miniaturized capillary column significantly decreases the required enzyme amount and achieves high enzyme yield, with reduced non-selective adsorption and excellent repeatability. The immobilized arginase retains high activity over time, making it suitable for recognizing a variety of inhibitor molecules and plant extracts.
A simple and rapid Nano LC method has been developed for the screening of arginase inhibitors. The method is based on the immobilization of biotinylated arginase on a neutravidin functionalized nano HPLC capillary column. The arginase immobilization step performed by frontal analysis is very fast and only takes a few minutes. The miniaturized capillary column of 170 nL (length 5 cm, internal diameter 75 mu m) significantly decreased the required amount of used enzyme (25 pmol). This was of significance importance when working with less available or expensive purified enzyme. Non-selective adsorption of the organic monolith matrix was reduced (<6%) and the arginase efficient yield was high (92%). The resultant affinity capillary columns showed excellent repeatability and long lifetime. The arginase reaction product was achieved within 60 s and the immobilized arginase retained 97% of the initial activity beyond 90 days. This novel approach can thus be used for the fast evaluation of recognition assay induced by a series of inhibitor molecules (caffeic acid phenylamide, chlorogenic acid, piceatannol, nor-NOHA acetate) and plant extracts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据