4.6 Article

Ultratrace analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in drinking water using ice concentration linked with extractive stirrer and high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1659, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462493

关键词

Microextraction; Liquid chromatography; Contaminated water; Pollutants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple and ultratrace analytical method for PFAS in drinking water was developed, with a low sample volume requirement and minimal organic solvent use. The method showed wide linear range, ultratrace limits of detection, and good accuracy and precision, detecting PFAS compounds in the majority of samples tested.
Detection of drinking water contaminants is vital to the protection of human health. One group of contaminants that have recently generated serious concerns over health risks are per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These compounds are very bio-persistent, leading to their detection in all types of water sources, including drinking water. While analysis of drinking water for PFAS is important, it is currently arduous to detect ultratrace levels of these contaminants. Specifically, current ultratrace PFAS analysis methods are difficult, costly, require large sample volumes, and consume relatively large volumes of organic solvent. In the present work, an analytical method using Ice Concentration Linked with Extractive Stirrer (ICECLES) and high performance liquid chromatography-tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS), was developed and validated to provide simple and ultratrace analysis of drinking water for 14 PFAS. The method featured a relatively low sample volume requirement (10 mL), automated extraction, minimal matrix effects, and minimal organic solvent use (i.e., the method requires only 50 mu L of methanol per sample). The method produced a wide linear range of 0.5 to 500 ng/L, ultratrace limits of detection (0.05 to 0.3 ng/L), and good accuracy and precision (i.e., 87 to 108% accuracy and = 19% relative standard deviation as a measure of precision). This method was tested on drinking water samples from across the United States and detected at least one PFAS compound in 52 of the 53 drinking water samples tested. Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), and perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) were detected in 89, 96, and 77% of the samples tested with maximum concentrations of 268 ng/L for PFHxA, 213 ng/L for PFOA, and 75.7 ng/L for PFHpA. Additionally, perfluorononanoic acid, perfluorodecanoic acid, and perfluoroheptanoic acid were each detected in at least one drinking water sample at concentrations > 20 ng/L. The availability of the method presented here allows ultratrace detection of PFAS while circumventing many of the disadvantages of current methods. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据