4.7 Article

A Quantum Chemical Topology Picture of Intermolecular Electrostatic Interactions and Charge Penetration Energy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 4981-4995

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00263

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish MICINN [BES-2016-076986]
  2. FICyT [FC-GRUPIN-IDI/2018/000177]
  3. European Union FEDER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a conceptual and theoretical framework of short-range electrostatic interactions is presented based on the Interacting Quantum Atoms approach. By performing energy decomposition and dispersion corrections, a pairwise approximation to the total binding energy is derived along with energetic descriptors at varying distances. This framework also proposes a consistent definition of charge penetration energy within quantum chemical topology, primarily characterized by intramolecular electrostatic energy.
Based on the Interacting Quantum Atoms approach, we present herein a conceptual and theoretical framework of short-range electrostatic interactions, whose accurate description is still a challenging problem in molecular modeling. For all the noncovalent complexes in the S66 database, the fragment-based and atomic decomposition of the electrostatic binding energies is performed using both the charge density of the dimers and the unrelaxed densities of the monomers. This energy decomposition together with dispersion corrections gives rise to a pairwise approximation to the total binding energy. It also provides energetic descriptors at varying distance that directly address the atomic and molecular electrostatic interactions as described by point-charge or multipole-based potentials. Additionally, we propose a consistent definition of the charge penetration energy within quantum chemical topology, which is mainly characterized in terms of the intramolecular electrostatic energy. Finally, we discuss some practical implications of our results for the design and validation of electrostatic potentials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据