4.7 Article

Time-dependent atomistic simulations of the CP29 light-harvesting complex

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 155, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0053259

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG [KL-1299/18-1, 2247]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a new method for studying photosynthesis, focusing on the spectral densities of pigments in the CP29 complex of photosystem II. The role of pigments in the excitation energy transfer process is investigated, and the obtained spectral densities are compared with other light-harvesting complexes.
Light harvesting as the first step in photosynthesis is of prime importance for life on earth. For a theoretical description of photochemical processes during light harvesting, spectral densities are key quantities. They serve as input functions for modeling the excitation energy transfer dynamics and spectroscopic properties. Herein, a recently developed procedure is applied to determine the spectral densities of the pigments in the minor antenna complex CP29 of photosystem II, which has recently gained attention because of its active role in non-photochemical quenching processes in higher plants. To this end, the density functional-based tight binding (DFTB) method has been employed to enable simulation of the ground state dynamics in a quantum-mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) scheme for each chlorophyll pigment. Subsequently, the time-dependent extension of the long-range corrected DFTB approach has been used to obtain the excitation energy fluctuations along the ground-state trajectories also in a QM/MM setting. From these results, the spectral densities have been determined and compared for different force fields and to spectral densities from other light-harvesting complexes. In addition, time-dependent and timeindependent excitonic Hamiltonians of the system have been constructed and applied to the determination of absorption spectra as well as exciton dynamics. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据