4.7 Article

Origin invariant full optical rotation tensor in the length dipole gauge without London atomic orbitals

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 155, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0053450

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1650942]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a new method for computing the optical rotation tensor, which is simpler and less computationally demanding compared to other methods. Comparison of results on 22 organic molecules shows a good linear correlation between the LG(OI) and MVG approaches.
We present an origin-invariant approach to compute the full optical rotation tensor (Buckingham/Dunn tensor) in the length dipole gauge without recourse to London atomic orbitals, called LG(OI). The LG(OI) approach is simpler and less computationally demanding than the more common length gauge (LG)-London and modified velocity gauge (MVG) approaches, and it can be used with any approximate wave function or density functional method. We report an implementation at the coupled cluster with single and double excitations level (CCSD), for which we present the first simulations of the origin-invariant Buckingham/Dunn tensor in the LG. We compare LG(OI) and MVG results on a series of 22 organic molecules, showing good linear correlation between the approaches, although for small tensor elements, they provide values of opposite sign. We also attempt to decouple the effects of electron correlation and basis set incompleteness on the choice of gauge for specific rotation calculations on simple test systems. The simulations show a smooth convergence of the LG(OI) and MVG results with the basis set size toward the complete basis set limit. However, these preliminary results indicate that CCSD may not be close to a complete description of the electron correlation effects on this property even for small molecules and that basis set incompleteness may be a less important cause of discrepancy between choices of gauge than electron correlation incompleteness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据