4.7 Article

Lipid Oxidation: Role of Membrane Phase-Separated Domains

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING
卷 61, 期 6, 页码 2857-2868

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00104

关键词

-

资金

  1. CAPES
  2. Flanders Research Foundation [1200219N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The addition of lipid aldehyde molecules at the Lo/Ld domain interfaces of heterogeneous membranes increases membrane permeability, while their addition at homogeneous membranes does not have any effect. This finding contributes to a better understanding of the impact of oxidative stress on membranes and is significant for cancer treatment methods.
Lipid oxidation is associated with several inflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases, but many questions to unravel its effects on biomembranes are still open due to the complexity of the topic. For instance, recent studies indicated that phase-separated domains can have a significant effect on membrane function. It is reported that domain interfaces are hot spots for pore formation, but the underlying mechanisms and the effect of oxidation-induced phase separation on membranes remain elusive. Thus, to evaluate the permeability of the membrane coexisting of liquid-ordered (Lo) and liquid-disordered (Ld) domains, we performed atomistic molecular dynamics simulations. Specifically, we studied the membrane permeability of nonoxidized or oxidized homogeneous membranes (single-phase) and at the Lo/Ld domain interfaces of heterogeneous membranes, where the Ld domain is composed of either oxidized or nonoxidized lipids. Our simulation results reveal that the addition of only 1.5% of lipid aldehyde molecules at the Lo/Ld domain interfaces of heterogeneous membranes increases the membrane permeability, whereas their addition at homogeneous membranes does not have any effect. This study is of interest for a better understanding of cancer treatment methods based on oxidative stress (causing among others lipid oxidation), such as plasma medicine and photodynamic therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据