4.5 Article

An Exercise Demonstrating the Selection of Greener Compounds for a Specified Application

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION
卷 98, 期 7, 页码 2341-2346

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00128

关键词

Upper-Division Undergraduate; Chemoinformatics; Computer-Based Learning; Problem Solving/Decision Making; Molecular Modeling; Green Chemistry

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canada Research Chairs program
  3. Switchable Solutions Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This exercise allows students to learn about green chemistry principles, QSAR, and virtual screening by finding the greenest chemical in a hypothetical scenario. By generating structure libraries and predicting properties, students improve their ability to select the greenest chemical for an application.
Selecting less hazardous chemicals is a core tenet of green chemistry but is difficult to teach in practice. The upper-year undergraduate or graduate level exercise described here empowers students to make such decisions themselves. Students are tasked with finding the greenest chemical for a specific purpose described in a hypothetical scenario, although the scenario provided in the example could easily be replaced by a scenario related to the instructor's interests or expertise. The scenario specifies the class of chemical (e.g., a trialkylamine), a performance requirement, a safety requirement, and two environmental or health impacts to consider. To complete the exercise, students must generate a library of structures using free molecular structure library-building software and predict the properties of those chemicals using quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) software. Finally, the students review the predicted properties for select compounds that best match the design criteria. This exercise familiarizes students with QSARs and the concept of virtual screening and presents an opportunity for them to think critically about the selection of the greenest chemical for an application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据