4.5 Article

The role of Aspergillus nidulans polo-like kinase PlkA in microtubule-organizing center control

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 134, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.256537

关键词

Aspergillus; Polo like kinase; Microtubules; ApsB; SPB; sMTOC; PcpA; gamma-TuRC; gamma-TuCRs; Mto1; Mto2

资金

  1. German Science Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) [DFG Fi459/20-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Centrosomes are essential microtubule-organizing centers in animal cells, while spindle pole bodies serve as functional analogs in fungi. Additional MTOCs have been identified in Aspergillus nidulans, with differing composition and organization from centrosomes. The polo-like kinase PlkA plays a crucial role in coordinating MTOC activities by interacting with gamma-tubulin ring complex receptors.
Centrosomes are important microtubule-organizing centers (MTOC) in animal cells. In addition, non-centrosomal MTOCs (ncMTOCs) have been described in many cell types. The functional analogs of centrosomes in fungi are the spindle pole bodies (SPBs). In Aspergillus nidulans, additional MTOCs have been discovered at septa (sMTOC). Although the core components are conserved in both MTOCs, their composition and organization are different and dynamic. Here, we show that the polo-like kinase PlkA binds the gamma-tubulin ring complex (gamma-TuRC) receptor protein ApsB and contributes to targeting ApsB to both MTOCs. PlkA coordinates the activities of the SPB outer plaque and the sMTOC. PlkA kinase activity was required for astral MT formation involving ApsB recruitment. PlkA also interacted with the gamma-TuRC inner plaque receptor protein PcpA. Mitosis was delayed without PlkA, and the PlkA protein was required for proper mitotic spindle morphology, although this function was independent of its catalytic activity. Our results suggest that the pololike kinase is a regulator of MTOC activities and acts as a scaffolding unit through interaction with gamma-TuRC receptors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据