4.5 Article

Tumour cell CD99 regulates transendothelial migration via CDC42 and actin remodelling

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 134, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.240135

关键词

CD99; CDC42; Actin cytoskeleton; Transendothelial migration; Metastasis; Breast cancer

资金

  1. University of Leeds
  2. Faculty of Medicine and Health PhD Scholarship
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CD99 plays a complex role in tumor progression, by promoting adhesion between tumor cells and endothelial cells while inhibiting invasion and migratory activity. It negatively regulates CDC42 and cell migration, demonstrating its dual pro- and anti-tumor activities, with implications in inhibiting metastatic progression in breast cancer.
Metastasis requires tumour cells to cross endothelial cell (EC) barriers using pathways similar to those used by leucocytes during inflammation. Cell surface CD99 is expressed by healthy leucocytes and ECs, and participates in inflammatory transendothelial migration (TEM). Tumour cells also express CD99, and we have analysed its role in tumour progression and cancer cell TEM. Tumour cell CD99 was required for adhesion to ECs but inhibited invasion of the endothelial barrier and migratory activity. Furthermore, CD99 depletion in tumour cells caused redistribution of the actin cytoskeleton and increased activity of the Rho GTPase CDC42, known for its role in actin remodelling and cell migration. In a xenograft model of breast cancer, tumour cell CD99 expression inhibited metastatic progression, and patient samples showed reduced expression of the CD99 gene in brain metastases compared to matched primary breast tumours. We conclude that CD99 negatively regulates CDC42 and cell migration. However, CD99 has both pro- and anti-tumour activity, and our data suggest that this results in part from its functional linkage to CDC42 and the diverse signalling pathways downstream of this Rho GTPase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据