4.6 Review

Blocking antibody-mediated phosphatidylserine enhances cancer immunotherapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 147, 期 12, 页码 3639-3651

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03792-3

关键词

Phosphatidylserine; Cancer; Immunotherapy; Tumor microenvironment

类别

资金

  1. Training Project of Key Talents of Youth Medicine in Jiangsu province, China [QNRC2016330]
  2. High-level talent six one projects top talent scientific research project of Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphatidylserine (PS) targeted therapy plays a crucial role in cancer immunotherapy by inhibiting tumor growth, enhancing immunity, and offering new perspectives for future therapies.
Cancer immunotherapy is a major breakthrough in tumor therapy and has been used in monotherapy or combination therapy. However, it has been associated with poor immune tolerance in some patients or immune-related adverse events. Therefore, ideal and reliable tumor elimination strategies are urgently needed to overcome these shortcomings. Phosphatidylserine (PS) is a negatively charged phospholipid, usually present in the inner lobules of eukaryotic cell membranes. Under certain physiological or pathological conditions, PS may be exposed on the outer leaflets of apoptotic cells serving as recognition signals by phagocytes and modulating the immune response. On the contrary, increased exposure of PS in the tumor microenvironment can significantly antagonize the body's anti-tumor immunity, thereby promoting tumor growth and metastasis. During radiotherapy and chemotherapy, PS-mediated immunosuppression increases the PS levels in necrotic tissue in the tumor microenvironment, further suppressing tumor immunity. PS-targeted therapy is a promising strategy in cancer immunotherapy. It inhibits tumor growth and improves the anti-tumor activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors. A comprehensive understanding of the mechanism of PS-targeted therapy opens up a new perspective for future cancer immunotherapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据