4.7 Article

Structural characterization of cassava linamarase-linamarin enzyme complex: an integrated computational approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS
卷 40, 期 19, 页码 9270-9278

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2021.1925156

关键词

Linamarase; Linamarin; molecular dynamics simulation; molecular docking; Cassava

资金

  1. Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST) through the African Development Bank (AfDB) [295, P-Z1-IA0-016, 2100155032816]
  2. German Academic Exchange Services (DAAD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The three-dimensional structure of cassava linamarase was established for the first time in this study using homology modeling, with molecular docking calculations and molecular dynamics simulations revealing its interaction with linamarin. The study sheds light on exploration of the enzyme's reaction mechanisms and provides insights into its stability through different computational approaches.
Cassava linamarase is a hydrolyzing enzyme that belongs to a glycoside hydrolase family 1 (GH1). It is responsible for breaking down linamarin to toxic cyanide. The enzyme provides a defensive mechanism for plants against herbivores and has various applications in many fields. Understanding the structure of linamarase at the molecular level is a key to avail its reaction mechanism. In this study, the three-dimensional (3D) structure of linamarase was built for the first time using homology modelling and used to study its interaction with linamarin. Molecular docking calculations established the binding and orientation nature of linamarin, while molecular dynamics (MD) simulation established protein-ligand complexes' stability. Binding-free energy based on MM/PBSA was further used to rescore the docking results. An ensemble structure was found to be relatively stable compared to the modelled structure. This study sheds light on the exploration of linamarase towards understanding its reaction mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据