4.5 Article

A multi-objective optimization of stent geometries

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110575

关键词

Stent design; Computational modeling; Wall shear stress

资金

  1. Australian Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on optimizing stent designs for hemodynamic performance by identifying ideal combinations of design variables. The usage of multi-objective optimization algorithms helped predict ideal designs that could reduce adverse events risk and enhance mechanical performance of the stents. Three best designs for each objective and two overall best designs were identified out of 50 designs.
Stents are scaffolding cardiovascular implants used to restore blood flow in narrowed arteries. However, the presence of the stent alters local blood flow and shear stresses on the surrounding arterial wall, which can cause adverse tissue responses and increase the risk of adverse outcomes. There is a need for optimization of stent designs for hemodynamic performance. We used multi-objective optimization to identify ideal combinations of design variables by assessing potential trade-offs based on common hemodynamic indices associated with clinical risk and mechanical performance of the stents. We studied seven design variables including strut crosssection, strut dimension, strut angle, cell alignment, cell height, connector type and connector arrangement. Optimization objectives were the percentage of vessel area exposed to adversely low time averaged WSS (TAWSS) and adversely high Wall Shear Stress (WSS) assessed using computational fluid dynamics modeling, as well as radial stiffness of the stent using FEA simulation. Two multi-objective optimization algorithms were used and compared to iteratively predict ideal designs. Out of 50 designs, three best designs with respect to each of the three objectives, and two designs in regard to overall performance were identified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据