4.6 Article

Study of mechanical and rheological properties, morphology, and miscibility in polylactid acid blends with thermoplastic polymers

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 139, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.51662

关键词

biopolymers and renewable polymers; morphology; mechanical properties; structure-property relationships; thermoplastics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found significant differences in structure and properties among different blends with polylactid acid. Polyolefin based blends showed a high negative deviation from the rule of mixtures, while blends of PET and PS exhibited properties close to the rule of mixtures. Changes in glass transition temperatures indicated interactions between materials, with the PS/PLA pair showing the strongest interactions.
Blends of polypropylene, polystyrene (PS), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and high-, low- and linear low-density polyethylene (LDPE and LLDPE) with different contents on polylactid acid (PLA) were prepared. Tensile and impact properties and melt flow rate (MFR) of the mixtures were determined. Morphology was analyzed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and interactions were studied by measuring glass transition temperatures (T-g) as well as applying a model to quantify the composition dependence of tensile strength. Results show that there are significant differences on structure and properties among the blends. Polyolefin based blends feature heterogeneous structures with big particle sizes, which translates to blend properties with high negative deviation from the rule of mixtures (ROM), especially for LDPE and LLDPE. Blends of PET and PS feature smaller dispersed particles, resulting in blends with mechanical properties close to those of ROM. Shifting in glass transition temperatures indicate interactions between these materials, which were quantitatively determined indicating the strongest interactions for the PS/PLA pair followed by the PET/PLA mixture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据