4.6 Article

Effect of crump rubber on the solid particle erosion response of epoxy composites

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 139, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.51470

关键词

crump rubber; environmental pollutant; impingement angle; polymer composites; solid particle erosion

资金

  1. King Khalid University [R.G.P. 1/251/42]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid particle erosion response of neat epoxy and crumb rubber filled epoxy composites were investigated. The composites with 30 vol.% crumb rubber showed the best erosion resistance, attributed to the elastic nature of rubber particles.
Present investigation characterizes solid particle erosion response of neat epoxy and crump rubber filled epoxy composites. Three types of composites were prepared by reinforcing crump rubber particles (10, 20 and 30 vol.%) in epoxy matrix. Neat epoxy samples were also prepared for comparison. Thermo gravimetric analysis revealed crump rubber composites have higher stability as compared with neat epoxy specimen. Differential scanning calorimeter tests reveal higher glass transition temperature for crump rubber composites as compared with neat epoxy specimens. Erosion rate of the samples have been studied for different angles of impingement (30, 45, 60 and 90 degrees) and erodent impact velocity (30, 45 and 60 m/s). 30 vol.% of crump rubber reinforced epoxy composites reveal better resistance to erosion in comparison with other composites and neat epoxy; attributed to the elastic nature of crump rubber particles to absorb impact energy of erodent particles. For all the specimens, maximum erosion is noted at 60 degrees angle of impingement indicating semi-ductile response to erosion. Erosion efficiency and velocity exponent of samples also substantiate the semi-ductile behavior. Morphology of the eroded surfaces was analyzed using scanning electron microscope. Property map is used to compare the results available from the literature with the present study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据