4.6 Article

Talc reinforcement of polylactide and biodegradable polyester blends via injection-molding and pilot-scale film extrusion

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 138, 期 41, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.51225

关键词

biodegradable; biopolymers and renewable polymers; composites; extrusion; films

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The addition of talc in composites based on PLA and a biodegradable polyester was found to improve barrier properties without increasing mechanical strength. This indicates the potential for commercial PLA-based blends filled with talc to enhance their performance in terms of barrier properties.
As a renewable and biodegradable polymer, polylactide (PLA) has taken a foothold in the packaging industry. However, the thermomechanical and barrier properties of PLA-based films need to be improved to facilitate a wider adoption. To address this challenge, we examined the effect of talc reinforcement in composites based on PLA and a biodegradable polyester. Masterbatches of the polymers and talc were produced by melt compounding and processed by either injection-molding or film extrusion in a pilot-scale unit operating at 60-80 m/min. The effect of talc was investigated in relation to the morphological, thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties of the composites. Based on SEM-imaging, talc was found to increase the miscibility of PLA and the polyester while acting as a nucleating agent that improved PLA crystallinity. While this effect did not track with an increased mechanical strength, the composites with 3-4 wt% talc displayed a significantly higher barrier to water vapor. Compared to the neat polymer films, a reduction of water vapor transmission rate, by -34-37%, was observed at 23 degrees C/50% RH. Meanwhile, the systems loaded with 1 wt% talc showed a reduction in oxygen transmission rates, by up to 34%. Our results highlight the challenges and prospects of commercial PLA-based blends filled with talc from films extruded in pilot-scale units.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据