4.6 Article

Plasma-driven solution electrolysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 129, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0044261

关键词

-

资金

  1. Army Research Office
  2. Office of the Provost
  3. Office for Research
  4. Northwestern University Information Technology
  5. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences [DE-SC0020232, DE-SC0016053]
  6. National Science Foundation [PHY-1902878, PHYS 1903151]
  7. [W911NF-20-1-0105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasma interacting with liquids can generate a highly reactive liquid layer, enabling selective, efficient, and green chemical transformations and new material synthesis. PDSE can be seen as replacing a metal electrode in an electrolytic cell with a gas phase plasma, which is crucial for driving transformational advances in PDSE.
Plasmas interacting with liquids enable the generation of a highly reactive interfacial liquid layer due to a variety of processes driven by plasma-produced electrons, ions, photons, and radicals. These processes show promise to enable selective, efficient, and green chemical transformations and new material synthesis approaches. While many differences are to be expected between conventional electrolysis and plasma-liquid interactions, plasma-liquid interactions can be viewed, to a first approximation, as replacing a metal electrode in an electrolytic cell with a gas phase plasma. For this reason, we refer to this method as plasma-driven solution electrochemistry (PDSE). In this Perspective, we address two fundamental questions that should be answered to enable researchers to make transformational advances in PDSE: How far from equilibrium can plasma-induced solution processes be driven? and What are the fundamental differences between PDSE and other more traditional electrochemical processes? Different aspects of both questions are discussed in five sub-questions for which we review the current state-of-the art and we provide a motivation and research vision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据