4.6 Article

Investigation of high harmonic generation from laser ablated plumes of silver

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 130, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0054337

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences President's International Fellowship Initiative [2021PM0036]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12004380]
  3. Jilin Provincial Science & Technology Development Project [YDZJ202102CXJD002]
  4. K. C. Wong Education Foundation [GJTD-2018-08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the characteristics of silver plasma in high harmonic generation, comparing the impact of different types of targets on harmonic yield and finding that plasma from nano-powders target produces higher harmonic yields. The ion types of the measured plasma were determined by comparing experimental data, with the results indicating significantly more nanoparticles in plasma generated from nano-powder samples than in plasma from bulk samples.
Silver (Ag) is one of the important targets in the studies of high harmonic generation (HHG) in the laser-induced plasma due to the relatively high conversion generation efficiencies and cut-off energy. In this work, we study the dependence of HHG in plasma plumes of Ag as a function of various laser parameters, including intensity of ablation pulse, intensity and ellipticity of driving pulse, and the delay between the two pulses. We identify the type of ion that dominates the measured HHG spectra by comparing the experimental data with strong-field approximation simulations and classical calculations for Ag atoms, Ag+, and Ag2+ ions. We also perform a comparative HHG study between the plasmas of bulk Ag target and the plasmas of a nano-powders target. It is found that the harmonic yields in the latter case are higher over a wide range of the aforementioned laser parameters. The results also indicate that the number of nanoparticles in the plasma generated from a nano-powder sample is indeed significantly greater than that in the plasma from the bulk sample.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据