4.6 Article

Association of KCTD15 gene with fat deposition in pigs

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jpn.13587

关键词

clone; fat deposition; KCTD15; pig

资金

  1. National Government [YDZX20195400004426]
  2. Yunnan Science and Technology Project [22018FG001-003]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32060736]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that KCTD15 plays an important role in pig fat deposition, with differential expression levels in different pig breeds. Additionally, the T-2030C site was identified as a crucial regulatory site for transcriptional activity in pig fat deposition.
KCTD15 is associated with body mass index and fat deposition in humans, mice and chickens. However, the function of KCTD15 in pig fat deposition remains unclear. In this study, we cloned and analysed the cDNA sequence of porcine KCTD15. The full length of the mRNA sequence of KCTD15 is 4,091 bp, encoding 283 amino acids. The protein is hydrophilic, it has a relative molecular mass of about 31.9 kDa and an isoelectric point of 7.09 with no signal peptide sequence or transmembrane structure. Expression analysis showed that KCTD15 expression level was significantly higher in the tissues of Large White pigs (LW) than in those of Tibetan pigs (TP) and Diannan Small-ear pigs (DN) at 6 months of age, whereas its expression level in embryonic tissues of LW at 60 days was lower than that in tissues of TP and Wujin pigs (WJ). In pig primary adipocytes, the expression level of KCTD15 is high in the early stage of differentiation and gradually decreases in later stages. Additionally, the single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) site T-2030C (T/C mutation, located 2,030 bp upstream of the start codon) showed a dominant allele T with high promoter activity in the LW population and a dominant allele C in the TP and WJ populations. Our results indicate that KCTD15 is involved in pig fat deposition and that T-2030C is an important regulatory site for transcriptional activity, affecting fat deposition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据